Examiner Dacthang (Peter) Ngo

Grant ratio: 69.2% (71st percentile in Art Unit 2863 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.41. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: February 2025
Grant ratio 69.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.41
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90887
Primary art unit
2863
Work group
2860
Technology center
2800
Applications
276
Granted applications
191

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 42 59.1% 1.74
Group 130 67.0% 1.82
Tech Center 2,428 61.6% 1.69
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.43 678 office actions across 279 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 279 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 105 37.6%
2 OAs 72 25.8%
3 OAs 41 14.7%
4 OAs 34 12.2%
5+ OAs 27 9.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 28.6% 2014 2015: 47.4% 2015 2016: 53.1% 2016 2017: 43.5% 2017 2018: 59.5% 2018 2019: 83.9% 2019 2020: 77.8% 2020 2021: 84.0% 2021 2022: 84.2% 2022 2023: 95.8% 2023 2024: 86.4% 2024 2025: 100.0% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201414428.6%
201519947.4%
2016321753.1%
2017231043.5%
2018372259.5%
2019312683.9%
2020272177.8%
2021252184.0%
2022191684.2%
2023242395.8%
2024221986.4%
202533100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 279 12.5% 3.9% 78.9% 2.9%
Action 2 174 23.6% 2.3% 63.8% 6.3%
Action 3 102 20.6% 1.0% 69.6% 3.9%
Action 4 61 19.7% 8.2% 63.9% 4.9%
Action 5 27 7.4% 7.4% 74.1% 7.4%
Action 6 14 14.3% 7.1% 71.4% 0.0%
Action 7 10 10.0% 10.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 8 6 16.7% 0.0% 50.0% 16.7%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 17.9% 12 of 67 office actions
All years 17.0% 115 of 678 office actions
Change +0.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
8.5%
15.3%
26.5%
32.5%
2019: PEG
15.7%
18.0%
10.9%
15.2%
15.9%
2024: AI examples
22.7%
2025: August memo
11.1%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
75.0% 3/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 15, 2019 13/648,581 Reversed §101
Dec. 18, 2018 13/405,949 Affirmed in part §101 · §112
Jun. 18, 2018 13/267,561 Reversed §102
Jan. 19, 2018 13/175,007 Affirmed §101 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.