Examiner Son Le

Grant ratio: 76.6% (50th percentile in Art Unit 2868 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.74. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: July 2026
Grant ratio 76.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.74
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87449
Primary art unit
2868
Work group
2860
Technology center
2800
Applications
684
Granted applications
524
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5818
Supervisor
Catherine T Rastovski
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-0349

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 14 74.1% 1.72
Group 131 67.2% 1.82
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.73 1,185 office actions across 684 applications
Applications with office actions 99.3% 679 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 0.7%
1 OA 378 55.3%
2 OAs 191 27.9%
3 OAs 57 8.3%
4 OAs 33 4.8%
5+ OAs 20 2.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 0.0% 2010 2011: 83.3% 2011 2012: 77.3% 2012 2013: 81.3% 2013 2014: 74.2% 2014 2015: 80.4% 2015 2016: 86.0% 2016 2017: 69.7% 2017 2018: 82.6% 2018 2019: 79.2% 2019 2020: 84.1% 2020 2021: 87.3% 2021 2022: 97.0% 2022 2023: 90.0% 2023 2024: 80.6% 2024 2025: 40.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2010200.0%
2011363083.3%
2012443477.3%
2013483981.3%
2014624674.2%
2015564580.4%
2016433786.0%
2017332369.7%
2018463882.6%
2019483879.2%
2020443784.1%
2021554887.3%
2022333297.0%
2023403690.0%
2024312580.6%
2025401640.0%
20262300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 679 1.3% 14.1% 79.1% 1.8%
Action 2 301 3.3% 6.6% 87.4% 1.3%
Action 3 110 1.8% 3.6% 94.5% 0.0%
Action 4 53 0.0% 5.7% 90.6% 0.0%
Action 5 20 0.0% 5.0% 90.0% 5.0%
Action 6 11 0.0% 9.1% 81.8% 9.1%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 149 office actions
All years 1.8% 21 of 1,185 office actions
Change -1.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.8%
17.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.2%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
42.9% 3/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
12.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 24, 2025 17/884,753 Reversed §103
May. 8, 2025 17/043,424 Affirmed §103
Jun. 20, 2023 16/801,316 Reversed §102 · §103
Mar. 21, 2019 14/814,345 Affirmed in part N/A
Mar. 27, 2018 13/600,460 Affirmed §102 · §103
May. 4, 2016 12/280,048 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jan. 15, 2016 11/722,521 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.