Examiner Examiner Chima Igboko

Grant ratio: 67.3% (78th percentile in Art Unit 3771 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.48. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 67.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.48
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90624
Primary art unit
3771
Work group
3770
Technology center
3700
Applications
459
Granted applications
309
Examiner phone
(571) 272-8422
Supervisor
Darwin Erezo
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4695

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 72 53.8% 1.94
Group 269 49.0% 2.08
Tech Center 2,671 48.4% 2.01
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.50 1,149 office actions across 459 applications
Applications with office actions 97.8% 449 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 10 2.2%
1 OA 172 37.5%
2 OAs 112 24.4%
3 OAs 57 12.4%
4 OAs 48 10.5%
5+ OAs 60 13.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 0.0% 2013 2014: 71.4% 2014 2015: 72.7% 2015 2016: 73.8% 2016 2017: 71.1% 2017 2018: 74.3% 2018 2019: 82.1% 2019 2020: 92.7% 2020 2021: 78.9% 2021 2022: 74.2% 2022 2023: 80.0% 2023 2024: 72.2% 2024 2025: 53.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2013100.0%
2014211571.4%
2015221672.7%
2016423173.8%
2017382771.1%
2018352674.3%
2019393282.1%
2020413892.7%
2021383078.9%
2022312374.2%
2023302480.0%
2024362672.2%
2025392153.8%
20264600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 449 0.0% 15.1% 71.0% 6.5%
Action 2 277 0.0% 19.9% 73.6% 5.1%
Action 3 165 0.0% 13.9% 77.6% 7.3%
Action 4 108 0.9% 13.9% 75.0% 9.3%
Action 5 60 0.0% 1.7% 86.7% 11.7%
Action 6 40 0.0% 5.0% 90.0% 5.0%
Action 7 20 0.0% 0.0% 90.0% 5.0%
Action 8 14 0.0% 7.1% 92.9% 0.0%
Action 9 6 0.0% 16.7% 83.3% 0.0%
Action 10 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 266 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 1,149 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
62.5% 5/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
75.0% 6/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 29, 2022 15/767,934 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jun. 29, 2022 15/481,562 Reversed §103
Dec. 23, 2021 15/441,398 Reversed §103 · §112
Mar. 30, 2020 15/198,780 Reversed §102
Sep. 3, 2019 13/485,555 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Jan. 10, 2019 13/578,555 Affirmed §103
Nov. 14, 2017 13/744,696 Reversed §103
Sep. 26, 2017 13/485,494 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.